![]() |
||
VOLUMEN XXIII |
![]() |
INVIERNO 2015 |
ANALYZING JUDICIAL COURTS' PERFORMANCE: INEFFICIENCY VS. CONGESTION
|
MARTA ESPASA ALEJANDRO ESTELLER-MORÉ University of Barcelona & Institut d'Economia de Barcelona |
Ascertaining the cause/s of differences in performance between units of the
public administration is at least as important as quantifying the very level
of individual performance. We identify two causes: inefficiency and congestion.
Inefficiency might be due to the fact that inputs are of relatively
low quality (e.g, temporary workers) and/or, for a given quality, to the fact
that inputs do not have incentives to exert their maximum level of effort.
Congestion arises when the number of new cases is above the number that
can be solved when full efficiency is achieved. This decomposition is applied
to the universe of Catalonian first instance courts for the period
2005-13 applying a fixed-effect panel stochastic frontier model (Wang and
Ho, 2010). In this particular case, we conclude that poor performance is not
due to inefficiency on the courts' side, but to an increase in the litigation
demand, that is, to congestion, while inefficiency tends to decrease along
time and is correlated with the presence of temporary judges. |
Key words: civil law courts, technical efficiency, stochastic frontier analysis, panel data. Clasificación JEL: K40, C23. |
PARA DESCARGARTE EL ARTÍCULO PULSA AQUÍ |
![]() |